Recent content by PerFnurt

So what is the problem? /Per www.perfnurt.se

Since I'm a bit allergic to macros (I would even suggest replacing your current macros with const int) I probably shouldn't suggest this...but anyway... You could define a macro that uses the stringify prepocessor operator (#), like this: #define ASSIGN_TO_MAP(map, value) map[#value]=value...

An alternative would be to put in in a map. #include <map> typedef std::map<std::string, int> MyMap; // ... { // Setup Map MyMap map; map["1ST_OPTION"] = 1; map["2ND_OPTION"] = 2; map["3RD_OPTION"] = 3; // etc. // ... // Query for existance/value MyMap::iterator...

Put the #include<string> into the .h file instead. And refer to it winth the std namespace. And make it a const ref. Ie #include<string> . . . class Bitmap { public: Bitmap(const std::string&); . . . /Per www.perfnurt.se

The most comman way to make your datastructures persistant is to write them to files on disk. /Per www.perfnurt.se

>Can you suggest something else that I can use instead of an enumerator? An iterator? /Per www.perfnurt.se

You won't necessarily get an Access Violation when you do funny stuff with unallocated memory. That is one reason such bugs can be somewhat tricky to find as they sometimes result in funny, unexplainable (at first), behavior. /Per www.perfnurt.se

You should not distribute debug builds. /Per www.perfnurt.se

No. /Per www.perfnurt.se

See faq116-5162 - Threads in a GUI (MFC) app the easy way /Per www.perfnurt.se

C++ simply doesn't support 100% pure OOP. If that is a problem, use another language, like SmallTalk which is very OO. Being 100% OO doesn't necessarily make sense in a non-academic world though... /Per www.perfnurt.se

>So why will microsoft ask you to "load symbols" to debug a problem? Are you seeing their variables? Exactly. Seeing symbols (or their contents rather) is what debugging is all about. Debug symbols are stored in .pdb files, so if you don't have the .pdb file for some module that's loaded...

>I need this external class to be able to access the Dialog Class, to set and get text from a edit box. Consider if it's not the other way around. Ie the Dialog sets / gets data to the other class. Reason: Acting upon events in the dialog is trivial since there is already message handling...

http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/vccore/html/_core_building_on_the_command_line.3a_.overview.asp /Per www.perfnurt.se

Not really. That functionality has been explicitly removed. http://forums.microsoft.com/MSDN/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=10007&SiteId=1 If I write the macro myself I can generate anything. Actually I probably won't even generate the whole makefile, but rather just a makefile macro stating the .obj...