Recent content by piken

prex1, thanks for the input. I decided to go with encoding HTML entities at the source of concern.... example... print <INPUT TYPE="hidden" NAME="AD1" VALUE='.encode_entities($in{AD1}).'>; CGI param then does a good job at decoding the HTML entities on input.

Well...... Thanks for all the great input and the heads up. $in{$key}=encode_entities($value=$in{$key}); This was the line that was troubling me. Annihilannic; It does work without the "$value" rharsh; This was a real good way to do it. foreach my $key (keys %in_dirty) { $in_clean{$key}...

I guess you made me think about it a little more... >What is the $value= assignment for? Does it work without it? $in{$key}=encode_entities($value=$in{$key}); $in{$key} is a reference, to get the value of the reference you need to assign it, thus $value=$in{$key} once you have the value...

HTML::Entities is used as part of a safety measure to help fight against "cross site scripting" It's possible for someone to enter unscrupulous HTML code and have it written back to the client browser. such as... <IMG SRC="javascript:alert('XSS');"> HTML::Entities will convert the HTML in...

you may forget to update both versions" that was a good point I didn't think about, but values are never changed inline, they would be assigned to a variable and modified in the variable. Since this script generates several dynamic web pages through out almost 6000 lines of code and about 80%...

Err.. this is a perl question. HTML::Entities is a perl module. If you have ever done any perl cgi programming this should be very obvious and would also be very clear as to the question. So if you don't know what you are responding about... don't respond.

Does anyone see a problem with doing something as simple as this with form input. Object is to create two hashes from one, one for printing back to client safely (encoded) and the other to store the data in original non-encoded format. ================================= my %in_c = %in; # copy...

Thanks, Done, just swapped out and came right back up, no problems.

Thanks for your reply. I understand the striping better now, but that's why I got so confused, in setting up the raid array under compaq it only has 0,1+0,5 wether you put 2 drives or four drives in your array. In other words even if you use only 2 drives your choices are 0,1+0. I was thinking...

Just checking to see if my thinking is correct...... I've got a TN767E(DS1) circuit pack, (purple label) which I know is Hot Swapable, but I'm wondering if I need to busy out the board first, I'm thinking I wouldn't have to busy it out and that it should just come back up upon slipping the new...

When setting up an array I only see a choice for raid levels 0,1+0 and 5. This confuses me.... If I only install 2 drives and choose 1+0 does the controller see this and really only create a mirror(level 1) and when I install 4 drives and choose 1+0 does it then do mirror and stripe? Or does...

Thanks for your reply. On my external peice of equipment I've been switching between national and 5ess, both seem to work (fairly well). Since the g3 is set to "a" I'll try 4ess on my equipment and see if it works any better. All three must be very close. The trunk group I think I'll leave...

DS1 circuit pack has setting for Protocol Version a,b,c What do a,b,c mean, a=custom? b=NI2, c=???? Also in my trunk group (ISDN/PRI) for the above DS1 cp it has a Supplementary Service Protocol of a=national, b=Q-sig I've currently got this T1 (ISDN/PRI) headed to a piece of equipment and...

Nope, tried that. Still need an ext. setup on the switch. You would think audix would just transfer it to the switch and let the switch take care of but doesn't. So you still need to set up a ghost ext.

Already tried that, maybe it's because I'm on an older system ( g3siv6) don't have choice of "any", only "subscribers" or "digits". The closest I've been able to come is setting something up pretty wacky..... ie. 504 x (ghost ext.) with all calls going to cover. Cover path has single cover of...